CarbonWatch

A 500-token answer produced by DeepL costs about 0.25 Wh, or 0.063 gCO₂e. DeepL is a chat service whose inference runs in the European Union, where power is worth 250 gCO₂e per kilowatt-hour.

What CarbonWatch records

Kind of useChat
Inference regionEuropean Union EU
Grid intensity250 gCO₂e/kWh
Energy rate0.5 Wh / 1 000 tokens — rate specific to this service, declared in the registry: the model served is not a frontier one
Bytes per token25

Three reference points

The estimate is linear: these three rows are the same calculation at three scales. They are orders of magnitude, not measurements.

One 500-token answer0.25 Wh0.06 gCO₂e
A hundred answers — a working day with an assistant25 Wh6.25 gCO₂e
A thousand answers250 Wh62.5 gCO₂e

The same usage elsewhere

The same exchange, the same model, billed at another region's grid. This is the point in the calculation where the choice of provider weighs heaviest — more than the length of the answers.

Switzerland40 g/kWh0.01 gCO₂e
France50 g/kWh0.01 gCO₂e
European Union this service250 g/kWh0.06 gCO₂e
United States380 g/kWh0.1 gCO₂e
World480 g/kWh0.12 gCO₂e
China580 g/kWh0.15 gCO₂e

How it is detected

Outgoing connections to these domains, resolved into addresses. The comparison is made on the address, never on the hostname: nothing is decrypted, nothing is read.

  • api.deepl.com
  • www.deepl.com

What this figure does not say

The scope is operational: the electricity of inference, and nothing else. Not the manufacturing of the servers, not the training of the model amortised over requests, not the transport network.

The rate is the one for the service type, not for the exact model you called: CarbonWatch does not read content and cannot tell whether an answer came from a small model or a large one. A long chain of reasoning costs more than what is counted here.

The ratio between bytes received and tokens produced is the most uncertain parameter of the model. It is adjustable, service by service, in the registry.